Email
Gregory S. McNeal | Technology, Entrepreneurship, Startups, Law | Founder, Investor, Professor | Gregory S. McNeal | Technology, Entrepreneurship, Startups, Law | Founder, Investor, Professor |
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Law and Public Policy
  • NDAA May Put Defense Contractors In Prison For Counterfeit Parts

Law and Public Policy

21 Feb

NDAA May Put Defense Contractors In Prison For Counterfeit Parts

  • By Greg McNeal
  • In Law and Public Policy

NewImage

Over at Forbes, where I write a column on Law, Policy and National Security, I’ve posted a piece entitled NDAA May Put Defense Contractors In Prison For Counterfeit Parts.  Here is an excerpt:

The NDAA, which was passed earlier this year, shifts the burden to contractors to screen their equipment for counterfeit parts.  This regulatory approach is similar to the burden shifting approach being debated for cyber security legislation.  However, unlike the proposed cyber security legislation, the provisions of the NDAA include civil and criminal penalties with the possibility of life in prison for those whose recklessness with regard to counterfeit parts results in death.

The NDAA addresses counterfeit parts in Section 818, specifically requiring DoD “conduct an assessment of Department of Defense acquisition policies and systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts.”  Following that assessment, DoD must:

  • establish Department wide definitions for the terms “counterfeit electronic part” and “suspect counterfeit electronic part”
  • implement a risk-based approach to minimize the impact of counterfeit electronic parts
  • establish a process for analyzing, assessing, and acting on reports of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts

The legislation’s provisions require DoD to promulgate regulations that:

  • make contractors “responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts in such products and for any rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts”
  • prohibit contractors from passing those costs off to DoD as allowable costs under their contracts
  • creates a safe harbor provision for contractors to avoid civil liability if they take reasonable efforts to avoid counterfeit parts or if they become aware of counterfeit parts report such parts to DoD within 60 days of detection
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Like this post?

Sign up for my email list featuring news about tech, surveillance, security, startups & geeky stuff  

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Tags:contractorscounterfeit partsforbesgreg mcneal law professorNDAA
Greg McNeal

You may also like

Police Drone

Police Drones, the Fourth Amendment, and Drone Trespass — A New Case In Michigan

  • March 20, 2021
  • by Greg McNeal
  • in Blog
Do landowners have a reasonable expectation of privacy as against observations made by the government using drones at low...
Can Government Keep Pace with Emerging Technology?
October 30, 2017
A Vision For The Future Of Drones
October 25, 2017
Greg McNeal Appointed To FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee
October 1, 2017

Categories

  • Blockchain
  • Blog
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Drones
  • Featured
  • Innovation
  • Law and Public Policy
  • Media Appearances
  • Movies and Television
  • Municipal Law
  • NFT
  • Presentations, Keynote Speeches & Expert Appearances
  • Privacy
  • Publications, Articles, White Papers
  • Start Ups
  • Surveillance
  • Uncategorized
  • Web3

Get in touch

Email

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

FTC Disclaimer

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in posts on this site are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."



© 2022 Gregory S. McNeal | Emerging Technology Expert, Entrepreneur and Professor | Drones, Smart Cities, Autonomous Cars, Privacy |