Email
Gregory S. McNeal | Founder, Investor, Professor | Emerging Technology, Web3, Blockchain and Privacy Gregory S. McNeal | Founder, Investor, Professor | Emerging Technology, Web3, Blockchain and Privacy
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Law and Public Policy
  • Trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Guantanamo: What To Do About Seemingly Coerced Statements?

Law and Public Policy

30 Apr

Trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Guantanamo: What To Do About Seemingly Coerced Statements?

  • By Greg McNeal
  • In Law and Public Policy

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp_8dGB3Ulo]

In light of the news (embedded above) that KSM and other 9/11 plotters will be tried in a military commission in Guantanamo, I thought it was appropriate to post to SSRN a symposium article entitled A Cup of Coffee After the Waterboard: Seemingly Voluntary Post-Abuse Statements.  The article focuses on the impact that abusive and coercive interrogation techniques will have on the admissibility of later statements derived from non-abusive, non-coercive interviews.

Were subsequent, legal, and humane interviews of KSM, indelibly impacted by the “taint of torture” regardless of how they were conducted? Accordingly, are statements made in those subsequent non-coercive settings inadmissible on voluntariness grounds?

This article first details the coercive interrogation techniques authorized against suspected terrorists detained in Guantanamo Bay Cuba. Next, the article details the changing circumstances of detainee custody and treatment to set the stage for a discussion of whether earlier abuses, if corroborated, will invalidate subsequent statements made by the victims of that abuse.

I explain how the U.S. government, recognizing that its earlier interrogation tactics may have jeopardized its legal case against the detainees implemented “clean teams.” Building off of these factual premises, I next synthesize the tests a judge will need to apply in order to determine the admissibility of seemingly voluntary post-abuse statements. In this synthesis I highlight how factors such as the time between statements, change in location, change in identity of interrogators, nature of the previous unlawful interrogation methods, and use of illegally procured statements as leverage in obtaining new statements each impact the admissibility analysis.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Like this post?

Sign up for my email list featuring news about tech, surveillance, security, startups & geeky stuff  

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Tags:admissibilitycat out of the bagcoercioncoercive interrogationGreg McNealgregory mcnealguantanamoguantanamo experthow long does the taint of torture lastinadmissibleinterviewsinvoluntaryKhalid Sheikh MohammedKSMmilitary commissionstaint of tortureTerrorismterrorism experttorturetotality of the circumstancesvoluntarinessvoluntarywaterboard
Greg McNeal

You may also like

Police Drone

Police Drones, the Fourth Amendment, and Drone Trespass — A New Case In Michigan

  • March 20, 2021
  • by Greg McNeal
  • in Blog
Do landowners have a reasonable expectation of privacy as against observations made by the government using drones at low...
Can Government Keep Pace with Emerging Technology?
October 30, 2017
A Vision For The Future Of Drones
October 25, 2017
Greg McNeal Appointed To FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee
October 1, 2017

Categories

  • Blog
  • Drones
  • Featured
  • Innovation
  • Law and Public Policy
  • Media Appearances
  • Municipal Law
  • Presentations, Keynote Speeches & Expert Appearances
  • Privacy
  • Publications, Articles, White Papers
  • Start Ups
  • Surveillance
  • Uncategorized

Get in touch

Email

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

FTC Disclaimer

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in posts on this site are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."



© 2022 Gregory S. McNeal | Emerging Technology Expert, Entrepreneur and Professor | Drones, Smart Cities, Autonomous Cars, Privacy |