Email
Gregory S. McNeal | Founder, Investor, Professor | Emerging Technology, Web3, Blockchain and Privacy Gregory S. McNeal | Founder, Investor, Professor | Emerging Technology, Web3, Blockchain and Privacy
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Media
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Law and Public Policy
  • UK agrees to settle for millions of dollars with ex-Guantanamo detainees

Law and Public Policy

16 Nov

UK agrees to settle for millions of dollars with ex-Guantanamo detainees

  • By Greg McNeal
  • In Law and Public Policy

According to the Associated Press, Britain has agreed to pay millions of dollars to former Guantanamo detainees, rather than risk exposing intelligence sources and methods.

It’s important to note here that these civil suits were successful based merely on allegations that the former detainees were tortured or abused.  One of the more well known plaintiffs in the civil suit was Binyam Mohamed, a former detainee who Tom Joscelyn points out admitted to receiving training provided by al Qaeda at the al Farouq training camp, and met with Abu Zubaydah, Jose Padilla, and other top terrorists.  If the U.K. government is willing to make a millionaire out of this guy, who knows what will happen in future cases:

The payout now also raises the question of whether other detainees outside of Britain could look to the settlement as a way of pushing pending lawsuits forward even if the British government has made no admission of guilt

Arguably, this was the better choice when one considers how much it would have cost the government to go to court.  Those costs can be measured in time, loss of intelligence officers, and dollars.  According to the story:

Government officials had estimated that the court cases could last 5 years and cost up to 50 million pounds ($80 million) in legal fees. Officials said about 100 intelligence officials had already been removed from regular duties to work on preparing up to 500,000 documents to be used in court.

This is a serious amount of money to be sure, and there is a risk of losses.  But does it justify the certainty associated with paying money to Mohamed who according to CSRT transcripts and memos proposed that al Qaeda should attack subway trains in the United States?  Does it justify rewarding a person who was instructed by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to target high rise buildings in the U.S. in a natural gas bomb plot?  Somehow I don’t see this as a just result, regardless of what abuses Mohamed may or may not have suffered.

Lawfare—making millionaires out of terrorists.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Like this post?

Sign up for my email list featuring news about tech, surveillance, security, startups & geeky stuff  

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Tags:detaineesgtmoguantanamointelligence and national securitylawfarelawsuitmillion dollar settlement for terroristsmoney damagessources and methods
Greg McNeal

You may also like

Police Drone

Police Drones, the Fourth Amendment, and Drone Trespass — A New Case In Michigan

  • March 20, 2021
  • by Greg McNeal
  • in Blog
Do landowners have a reasonable expectation of privacy as against observations made by the government using drones at low...
Can Government Keep Pace with Emerging Technology?
October 30, 2017
A Vision For The Future Of Drones
October 25, 2017
Greg McNeal Appointed To FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee
October 1, 2017

Categories

  • Blog
  • Drones
  • Featured
  • Innovation
  • Law and Public Policy
  • Media Appearances
  • Municipal Law
  • Presentations, Keynote Speeches & Expert Appearances
  • Privacy
  • Publications, Articles, White Papers
  • Start Ups
  • Surveillance
  • Uncategorized

Get in touch

Email

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

FTC Disclaimer

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in posts on this site are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."



© 2022 Gregory S. McNeal | Emerging Technology Expert, Entrepreneur and Professor | Drones, Smart Cities, Autonomous Cars, Privacy |